Brian Heiss and Pat McKenna – OJ Simpson Case.

Jul 26, 2022

Filmmaker Brian Heiss and legendary private investigator Pat McKenna join Ed Opperman to discuss the misrepresentation of evidence in the O.J. Simpson trial.

When OJ was declared not guilty of murdering Nicole Simpson and Ronald Goldman, it was not the resolution many expected; Much of the evidence heard in the case was hand picked to convict, but many other items of evidence were left out of the presentations for both defence and prosecution, evidence which would have exonerated ‘The Juice’.

It was one of the first real ‘show trials’, and spawned a mini-industry of its’ own, but if the evidence Brian and Pat present is accurate, why was it left out? The glass, the plane tickets, the gloves and that chase down the freeway.

In a final attempt to put right the accounts of history, McKenna and Heiss put their case. The conversati0on ranges around the LAPD’s Scientific Investigation Division which was in charge of all of the DNA evidence, much of which, without even the advances in technology, were questionable as evidence due to sloppy techniques and storage. The assumption that given the LAPD and the SID were suffering from a crime epidemic, they needed a ‘high profile’ win to remain unscrutinised.

Backgrounds: Pat McKenna F. Lee Bailey

TwitterBrian Heiss

BookThe Truth about the OJ Simpson Murder Trial

MediaOJ Simpson and the Murders of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman

YoutubeOJ trial Brian Heiss

Wikipedia OJ Simpson OJ Simpson Trial