We know how to think about government coercion. We have ready and familiar frameworks for evaluating how government power should be exercised against the private individual. But courts and policymakers increasingly are called to mediate between private actors with competing claims to liberty, and the analysis is perhaps more complex and uncertain. How should we evaluate such competing claims and what are the self-governance interests of citizens themselves? Do we have a good framework for resolving conflicting interests of corporations and natural citizens, and what role or responsibility does the state have in resolving those disputes?

Jonathan Berry, Managing Partner, Boyden Gray PLLC
James Burnham, President, Vallecito Capital, LLC
Erin Hawley, Senior Counsel, Alliance Defending Freedom
Casey Mattox, Vice President, Legal Strategy, Stand Together
Prof. Todd Zywicki, George Mason University Foundation Professor of Law, Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University
Moderator: Hon. Trevor N. McFadden, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia