Info
On Science vs. Spin, we break down viral research and show you what’s actually going on behind the curtain. Was the study done on humans—or rats? Was the sample size...
show more
On Science vs. Spin, we break down viral research and show you what’s actually going on behind the curtain. Was the study done on humans—or rats? Was the sample size large enough to matter? Are we looking at real clinical outcomes… or just surrogate markers dressed up as breakthroughs?
Each episode teaches you how to think like a researcher, spot statistical sleight of hand, and separate meaningful evidence from media hype. Because once you understand how studies really work, you stop being misled—and start seeing the world more clearly.
show less
Each episode teaches you how to think like a researcher, spot statistical sleight of hand, and separate meaningful evidence from media hype. Because once you understand how studies really work, you stop being misled—and start seeing the world more clearly.
Episodes & Posts
Episodes
Posts
Transcribed
8 SEP 2026 · Self-surveys dominate psychology and social psychology because they are cheap and easy to administer. The correct question is not whether people can answer Likert items, but whether those answers remain comparable across people, groups, or decades and whether the resulting scores correspond to anything that actually matters.
Transcribed
6 SEP 2026 · Food marketing does not always require a false statement to mislead consumers. By emphasizing one beneficial nutrient while withholding information about quantity and competing food sources, advertisers can make an ordinary product appear nutritionally exceptional. This article examines how cherry-picking, selective framing, and the health-halo effect shape what consumers believe about food.
Transcribed
30 AUG 2026 · Carlos talks with Dr. Brown about how flawed studies make it into publication and, from there, into headlines people trust. The conversation digs into common red flags — small sample sizes, p-hacking, conflicts of interest, and cherry-picked data — that separate rigorous science from spin dressed up as research. It's a practical guide to reading a study more critically before believing the claim built on top of it.
Transcribed
3 AUG 2026 · This episode examines the controversial diagnostic history and neuroscientific claims surrounding Dissociative Identity Disorder, pitting popular trauma-model narratives against rigorous scientific scrutiny. We analyze the strength of current neuroimaging evidence, evaluate methodological limitations in clinical studies, and explore how media portrayals and institutional biases can inflate diagnostic claims. By cutting through the noise of social media trends and therapeutic hype, we separate empirically validated research from iatrogenic artifacts to uncover what the data actually says about complex trauma and the human brain.
Transcribed
20 JUL 2026 · Popular trauma narratives claim that chronic stress reshapes the brain and body in ways that inevitably impair focus, flexibility, and emotional control while damaging physical health. This episode examines the evidence behind those claims, separating well-supported findings from oversimplified interpretations. We explore how neuroimaging, physiology, and animal research contribute to our understanding—and where the science is more uncertain than commonly portrayed.
Transcribed
25 MAY 2026 · Across decades of public health data, researchers have noticed a stunning trend: as global education rates climb, age-adjusted dementia numbers are beginning to drop. This episode breaks down the complex longitudinal studies tracking how even a single additional year of schooling correlates with a significantly delayed onset of cognitive decline. We analyze the variables at play, investigating whether degrees themselves protect the mind or if they simply act as a proxy for healthier lifelong habits.
Transcribed
15 MAY 2026 · Recent epidemiological data shows a devastating rise in aggressive, early-onset cancers among adults who experienced metabolic dysfunction before age 30. This episode examines the precise biomolecular pathways—including hyperinsulinemia, altered cytokine signaling, and chronic systemic inflammation—that accelerate tumor development in adipose tissue environments. Join clinical researchers as they dissect the newest peer-reviewed oncology studies to understand how early-life obesity fundamentally alters cellular mutation rates.
Transcribed
8 MAY 2026 · This podcast evaluates the scientific evidence supporting and questioning the role of sunscreen in melanoma prevention, drawing on randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses while addressing key limitations. It examines the interplay between sunscreen use and vitamin D synthesis, presenting arguments for potential interference alongside real-world data indicating minimal clinical impact. A balanced conclusion emphasizes evidence-based sun protection strategies tailored to individual risk profiles, particularly for high-risk ethnic groups in sunny environments.
Transcribed
6 MAY 2026 · This podcast episode explores the use of surrogate endpoints versus patient-important clinical outcomes in medical and psychological research studies, highlighting their role in accelerating trials while cautioning against over-reliance. It presents advantages such as faster, less expensive studies alongside critical limitations, including frequent failures to predict real clinical benefit as seen in cardiovascular, oncology, and Alzheimer’s research. Listeners receive a balanced framework for critically appraising research that employs surrogate markers.
Transcribed
5 MAY 2026 · We put the "obesity shrinks your brain" headlines under the microscope to separate causal reality from confounding variables. This episode navigates the neurodegeneration debate, questioning if the data holds up or if we're seeing another case of correlation being sold as causation. Join us as we strip away the spin to see what the evidence actually says about the relationship between weight and white matter.
On Science vs. Spin, we break down viral research and show you what’s actually going on behind the curtain. Was the study done on humans—or rats? Was the sample size...
show more
On Science vs. Spin, we break down viral research and show you what’s actually going on behind the curtain. Was the study done on humans—or rats? Was the sample size large enough to matter? Are we looking at real clinical outcomes… or just surrogate markers dressed up as breakthroughs?
Each episode teaches you how to think like a researcher, spot statistical sleight of hand, and separate meaningful evidence from media hype. Because once you understand how studies really work, you stop being misled—and start seeing the world more clearly.
show less
Each episode teaches you how to think like a researcher, spot statistical sleight of hand, and separate meaningful evidence from media hype. Because once you understand how studies really work, you stop being misled—and start seeing the world more clearly.
Information
| Author | Circle Of Insight Productions |
| Organization | Circle Of Insight Productions |
| Categories | Science , Medicine , Education |
| Website | - |
| - |
Copyright 2026 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
